Earth Retention Using Augered Cast-In-Place Piles - A. Introduction - 1. Applications

- Organization:
- Deep Foundations Institute
- Pages:
- 5
- File Size:
- 312 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1997
Abstract
a. When to use: high surcharges, vertical capacity required, limit noise and eliminate vibrations, low headroom, eliminate vibration induced settlements. b. Advantages: eliminates impact noise and vibrations, high section modulus if required, vertical load bearing capacity; corrosion resistant, easy to apply facing for use as a permanent wall, adapts to complex wall layouts, would allow top- down construction, very high uplift resistance. c. Disadvantages: spoil disposal, not water tight, cannot penetrate rock and most obstructions, soil can erode between the piles if surface water and ground water are not controlled, hard to install reinforcing beams over 409 long; subject to high negative skin friction loads, high grout takes in rubble and organic soils. e. Relative cost to other systems: 30% to 50% more expensive than driven soldier piles and lagging except when surcharge loads are involved, or the pile cannot be driven due to noise and vibrations. About the same cost as a sheet pile system. Very competitive if high vertical load must be supported by the wall.
Citation
APA:
(1997) Earth Retention Using Augered Cast-In-Place Piles - A. Introduction - 1. ApplicationsMLA: Earth Retention Using Augered Cast-In-Place Piles - A. Introduction - 1. Applications. Deep Foundations Institute, 1997.