Discussion of Session Two

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
J. Parker
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
3
File Size:
103 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1967

Abstract

As a practicing mining engineer, I face many rock mechanics' problems daily and would like to mention one or two examples to illustrate the current gap between laboratory investigations and actual field problems. I would like to endorse Dr. Obert's suggestion that more field measurements and observations should be undertaken. There is an ever-increasing body of data beginning with Hast's results in Sweden,l then measurements at Elliot Lake, Canada, and so on, including our own measurements at White Pine, which clearly indicate that the horizontal stresses underground. are often at least as large as the vertical stresses. Visual observation of the deformation of roof and pillars (including failure due to horizontal compres- sion) also demonstrates that the horizontal stresses are often most important: Yet almost every laboratory investigation begins with the assumption that the only stresses acting are vertical. Roof spans in layered formations. for example, are calculated on the assumption that the rock behaves as a gravity loaded beam. This is all too often unrealistic.
Citation

APA: J. Parker  (1967)  Discussion of Session Two

MLA: J. Parker Discussion of Session Two. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1967.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account