Conclusion Of A Two-Part Report - Trends In The Design Of Large Grinding Mills

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 4
- File Size:
- 344 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 5, 1965
Abstract
Up to now we have spoken optimistically of the many potential savings in capital and operating costs to be obtained from the selection of larger diameter and horsepower grinding mills. Such mills may well be the correct choice for one grinding plant but could be absolutely wrong for another plant. It is emphasized here that many significant factors other than the capital cost, labor, grinding media and power savings are involved in the sizing and selection of the optimum grinding circuit. The following discussion covers some of these factors and their relationship to larger mill design. The first consideration is: What is the grinding circuit supposed to do? In most instances it is one or both of the following: 1. Grind the feed material fine enough to liberate the desired minerals but with a minimum of over- grinding. Examples are preparation of ore for flotation, gravity separation, etc. 2. Grind to some pre-specified particle size or particle surface area. Examples of this are cement manufacture or the preparation of feed material for pelletizing; other examples are preparation for chemical reactions or ceramic manufacture.
Citation
APA:
(1965) Conclusion Of A Two-Part Report - Trends In The Design Of Large Grinding MillsMLA: Conclusion Of A Two-Part Report - Trends In The Design Of Large Grinding Mills. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1965.