Comparisons Between Copper, Lead And Nickel Smelting Processes From Thermodynamic Viewpoints

- Organization:
- The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society
- Pages:
- 10
- File Size:
- 611 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1998
Abstract
The similarities and differences in copper, nickel and lead smelting processes are discussed based on the sulfur-oxygen chemical potential diagrams and the free energy minimization assessments using a thermodynamic software. The prominent features of copper smelting are ascribable to the fact that copper has a strong affinity for sulfur but weak for oxygen and the liquid phase immiscibility between Cu and Cu2S. During the oxidation of sulfides, nickel metal is not stable except at temperatures higher than 1500°C, well miscible with its sulfide, and is oxidized more easily than copper. Metallic lead looks as stable as copper during the oxidation of the concentrate but Pb and PbS. are much more miscible with each other and the vaporization loss is considerable. In the reductive smelting of oxides, the effects of oxygen potential and temperature on the copper contents in slag are not significant due to the monovalent character of copper and the reduction of copper content in slag is not easy in practice. The effect of the slag compositions on the oxidic metal contents of slag is much more significant for lead than either copper or nickel. Due to the immiscible nature between Pb and Fe, high grade lead bullion is easily obtained and lead is more tolerant to impurities.
Citation
APA:
(1998) Comparisons Between Copper, Lead And Nickel Smelting Processes From Thermodynamic ViewpointsMLA: Comparisons Between Copper, Lead And Nickel Smelting Processes From Thermodynamic Viewpoints. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 1998.