Comparison Of Ground Conditions And Ground Control Practices In The United States And Australia

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Christopher Mark
Organization:
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Pages:
9
File Size:
523 KB
Publication Date:

Abstract

Australia and the United States both have large, modern underground coal mining industries. Many companies have invested in both countries, and there is growing awareness that technological developments in one country can rapidly affect the other. Yet the ability of technology to pass between the countries depends on comparability of ground conditions. Many Australian observers believe that their ground conditions are significantly poorer than typical U.S. conditions, but some U.S. professionals are not convinced. The author recently visited 10 Australian longwall mines and two room-and-pillar mines. Each mine visit included determination of the Coal Mine Roof Rating, roof support installed, pillar design, and an in-depth discussion of ground control experience. The Australian conditions observed are compared with an extensive data base from U.S. mines. The paper also offers observations on geotechnical data collection, monitoring, and the roles of the mine inspectorate and research community.
Citation

APA: Christopher Mark  Comparison Of Ground Conditions And Ground Control Practices In The United States And Australia

MLA: Christopher Mark Comparison Of Ground Conditions And Ground Control Practices In The United States And Australia. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account