Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar Formula

International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
Vincent A. Scovazzo
Organization:
International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
Pages:
8
File Size:
2230 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1995

Abstract

Many accepted and useful methods have been developed and used for pillar design. Each method has its own particular strengths and weaknesses. Three methods addressed in this paper are; empirical, analytical, and numerical. Each of these methods have their place in pillar design. Analytical methods result in close approximation of the ideal pillar (most economical, stable, or yielding) and are suitable for use in final mine design and in analyzing existing problems. BOYD uses the analytical method to develop site specific mine pillars design equations. An analytical method, one of many developed by BOYD, is presented here and is based on the procedure used by Wilson (1) and others in development of their empirical equations.
Citation

APA: Vincent A. Scovazzo  (1995)  Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar Formula

MLA: Vincent A. Scovazzo Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar Formula. International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, 1995.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account