Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar Formula

- Organization:
- International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
- Pages:
- 8
- File Size:
- 2230 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1995
Abstract
Many accepted and useful methods have been developed and used for pillar design. Each method has its own particular strengths and weaknesses. Three methods addressed in this paper are; empirical, analytical, and numerical. Each of these methods have their place in pillar design. Analytical methods result in close approximation of the ideal pillar (most economical, stable, or yielding) and are suitable for use in final mine design and in analyzing existing problems. BOYD uses the analytical method to develop site specific mine pillars design equations. An analytical method, one of many developed by BOYD, is presented here and is based on the procedure used by Wilson (1) and others in development of their empirical equations.
Citation
APA:
(1995) Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar FormulaMLA: Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar Formula. International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, 1995.