Cleveland Paper - Comparison of Results from Open-Topped and Closed-Topped Furnaces

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Frank Firmstone
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
5
File Size:
206 KB
Publication Date:

Abstract

In 1871, two furnaces at the Glendon Iron Works, which had been blown out on account of the "coal strike," were altered from the open-top plan with side flues for collecting the gas, to closed tops with cup and cone. In one furnace the suppression of the side flues permitted a considerable alteration in the profile, but in the other (No. 5) no change in this respect was made; the side flues were simply bricked up and new ones cut through the sides close to the top. This furnace was in blast over four years, and we can, therefore, form a pretty good idea of the effect of the alterations on the furnace process. The principal dimensions are; Height 72'; greatest diameter, 18'; diameter at tuyeres, 8'; diameter of top, 10'; diameter at stock line (point at which the top of the materials is kept), 11'; cubic contents, 11,900 cubic feet. The table below shows the average results for periods of twentysix weeks each. 1st, of the open-topped furnace; 2d, of the furnace with the first charger used, which was an ordinary cup and cone (diameter of cone 5' 2") 3d, with the charger used ever since, a " double " cone 7' 5" diameter outside, having a central opening 3' in diameter. The diagram (Plate 11) shows the daily variations, in the grade of the irons for the same periods.*
Citation

APA: Frank Firmstone  Cleveland Paper - Comparison of Results from Open-Topped and Closed-Topped Furnaces

MLA: Frank Firmstone Cleveland Paper - Comparison of Results from Open-Topped and Closed-Topped Furnaces. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers,

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account