Bulletin 59 Investigations of Detonators and Electric Detonators

- Organization:
- The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
- Pages:
- 80
- File Size:
- 4781 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1913
Abstract
Among the more important factors involved in the use of high
explosives in blasting operations is the means employed to bring about
the detonation of the charge. When flame is applied to high explosives
many of them may burn if not confined; but all of them when
burning under certain conditions of confinement may detonate.
Detonation may also be effected by mechanical means, such as frictional
impact caused by a blow or by rubbing between surfaces. By
this means, however, the full effect of the explosive charge may not
be developed, so that a partial detonation, often accompanied by the
burning of the explosive, results.
When nitroglycerin was first used it was fired by the application of
flame, but considerable difficulty was experienced in exploding it with
certainty and in obtaining uniform resl'llts. In 1864 Allred Noble, a
Swedish engineer, discovered that nitroglycerin could be surely and
completely detonated by exploding in contact with it a small quantity
of an initiatory explosive. Mercury fulminate was the substance
then found capable of producing the best results There are many
other fulminates and other substances that will produce complete
detonation of commercial" high" explosives, but detonators or electric
detonators containing mercury fulminate as the characteristic ingredient
are still almost exclusively used in this country.
The term" detonator" is used in the publications of the Bureau of
Mines to designate what the miner calls a "blasting cap "-a copper
capsule containing a small quantity of some detonating compound
that is ignited by a fuse. The term" electric detonator" is applied to
a blasting cap that is similar except for being ignited by means of a
small wire which is heated to incandescence or fused by the passage
of an electric current.
One of the conditions prescribed by the Bureau of Mines for a permissible
explosive a is that it shall be :fired by a detonator, or preferably
an electric detonator, having a charge equivalent to that of the
standard detonator used at the Pittsburgh testing station. A further requirement is that this charge shall consist by weight of 90 parts of
mercury fulminate and 10 parts of potassium chlorate (or their equivalents).
At the request of a manufacturer of permissible explosives, an investigation
was undertaken by the bureau to determine the relative
strength of detonators and electric detonators having different compositions.
The tests of electric detonators herein reported were
conducted by H. F. Braddock, junior chemist; J. W. Koster, J. E.
Tiffany, junior mining engineers; and A. S. Crossfield, junior explosives
chemist, at the Pittsburgh testing station of the bureau. Similar
tests of detonators were not conducted because it was believed that the
results would not show sufficient variation to warrant such tests. It
is hoped that the conclusions drawn from the tests made will be of
service to those using explosives by enabling them to select the
grade of detonator or electric detonator that will insure the most
effective results. The conclusions are given in this bulletin, which is
published by the Bureau of Mines as one of a series of publications
dealing with the testing of explosives and the precautions that should
be taken to increase safety and efficiency in the use of explosives
in mining operations.
The results of tho experiments described in this bulletin show that
the average percentage of failures of explosives to detonate was increased
more than 20 per cent when the lower grades of electric
detonators were used instead of No. 6 electric detonators, and was
increased more than 50 per cent when these lower grades were used
instead of No. 8 electric detonators. It is noteworthy, however,
that when sensitive explosives, such as 40 per cent strength ammonia
dynamite (p. 33), were tested under conditions ideal for detonation, the
same energy was developed irrespective of the electric detonator used.
When tests were made with a less sensitive explosive, such as a 40
per cent strength ammonia dynamite containing nitrosubstitution
compounds (p. 32), the energy developed increased with the grade of
the electric detonator used. For example, the average efficiency of
four different explosives was increased 10.4 per cent when a No.6
electric detonator was used instead of a No.4 electric detonator, and
14.9 per cent when aN 0.8 electric detonator was used (see tabulation
onp.45). The results of the tests emphasize the importance of using
explosives in a fresh condition, but as fresh explosives can not always
be had in mining work, strong detonators should be used in order to
offset any deterioration of explosives from age.
Citation
APA:
(1913) Bulletin 59 Investigations of Detonators and Electric DetonatorsMLA: Bulletin 59 Investigations of Detonators and Electric Detonators. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1913.