Base Grouted Piles - Mr. P. M Cashman, Independent Consultant

- Organization:
- Deep Foundations Institute
- Pages:
- 4
- File Size:
- 573 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1991
Abstract
My comments and questions are addressed to Mr. Troughton. It seems to me that the tests were very well tailored to determine long term effects on performance of bearing piles as groundwater pressures rise in the London Basin. This rise is being simulated by means of a groundwater recharge system but it would be informative to have further details of the controls of conditions simulated. Ideally the porewater pressure in Standpipes 1, 2 and 3 should be the same throughout the test. Under test conditions are there not practical difficulties? Recharge Well C2 is a lesser distance from the pile than the other wells. Was the rate of recharge to C2 regulated to a lesser rate than the other three? In my experience the rate of acceptance usually varies from well to well. Under a common feed pressure were measures taken to compensate for this? Since the problem does not only affect London, but also Liverpool, Nottingham, Birmingham and to a lesser extent, Manchester, I question whether an ideal procedure is being used. It is well known that rates of acceptance decrease with time and often recharge wells need to be flushed out at regular intervals. Other procedures may need to be adopted to accurately simulate the effect of groundwater rise, if tests of longer duration are to be considered.
Citation
APA:
(1991) Base Grouted Piles - Mr. P. M Cashman, Independent ConsultantMLA: Base Grouted Piles - Mr. P. M Cashman, Independent Consultant. Deep Foundations Institute, 1991.