Base Grouted Piles - Mr. P. M Cashman, Independent Consultant

Deep Foundations Institute
W. J. Kingwell
Organization:
Deep Foundations Institute
Pages:
4
File Size:
573 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1991

Abstract

My comments and questions are addressed to Mr. Troughton. It seems to me that the tests were very well tailored to determine long term effects on performance of bearing piles as groundwater pressures rise in the London Basin. This rise is being simulated by means of a groundwater recharge system but it would be informative to have further details of the controls of conditions simulated. Ideally the porewater pressure in Standpipes 1, 2 and 3 should be the same throughout the test. Under test conditions are there not practical dif­ficulties? Recharge Well C2 is a lesser dis­tance from the pile than the other wells. Was the rate of recharge to C2 regulated to a lesser rate than the other three? In my experience the rate of acceptance usually varies from well to well. Under a common feed pressure were mea­sures taken to compensate for this? Since the problem does not only affect London, but also Liverpool, Nottingham, Birmingham and to a lesser extent, Manchester, I question whether an ideal procedure is being used. It is well known that rates of acceptance decrease with time and often recharge wells need to be flushed out at regular intervals. Other pro­cedures may need to be adopted to accurately simulate the effect of groundwater rise, if tests of longer duration are to be considered.
Citation

APA: W. J. Kingwell  (1991)  Base Grouted Piles - Mr. P. M Cashman, Independent Consultant

MLA: W. J. Kingwell Base Grouted Piles - Mr. P. M Cashman, Independent Consultant. Deep Foundations Institute, 1991.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account