Assessment Of Interfacial Reactions Of Sulfide Copper, Lead And Zinc Minerals

[Comideha;tion o 4 chyakd- chem and aLtuctund phopetttiu o auRdide nm&, The in~o/uncction gained h ;to be uned ;to iM;tmph& ( I! dnukey bho hen mind-aundacu , ( 2 ) modidicakio~n 06 ;the minmd n~tdacu, and (3) eac;tiom at ;the mind adac fnom ;thu e baic din oipfina, concep;tc, wLth hegattd ;to .the changen kha;t awtgacu undehgu, heac;tiom kha;t might take place, ,the geom&y 04 ;the inkmduce, ;the nkde 04 diddmenk &om and iom in ;the intmdace, and okhm phyaicd and chemicd pttopemXu od an intmdace mun;t be developed, weighed and appfied. The au/tho~ ded wah thue concep;tud connidmatiom @om which hypokhuu me n& ko denchibe khe envhomenkd-ivttadaciae hela;tiomhipa doh nevmd nddide minettah, The ch&enge and moltivation in khe hu eattch h in a henhe a deattch doh baic dad and helcctiomkipa needed doh accompfi he&.] INTRODUCTION Qualitative and quantitative explanation of particulate solid separations are unknown entities because of the lack of adequate models and mathematical relationships to explain the activity occur- ring between the solid and liquid phases. It is a transitional region in which it is difficult to ascertain the mechanisms of adsorption of ions, molecules, etc. on mineral surfaces, as well as other secondary reactions which occur in interfacial regions. Thus, in this paper the authors deal with conceptual considerations from which hypotheses are set forth to describe the environmental- interfacial relationships for sulfide minerals.