Abrasion and Wear in Mills (c81aa51e-7cf2-4e98-8abb-ce5490402a45)

Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
K. G. Eriksson
Organization:
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Pages:
1
File Size:
46 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1983

Abstract

"The first tentative test made to try rubber lining in grinding mills was made in the early twenties. However, because of poor rubber compounds and design the results did not prove to be promising.In the early sixties successful trials of rubber linings were carried out as a result of a cooperation between boliden AB and Skega AB.One of the reasons rubber was not used earlier for linings was the difference in wear characteristics between rubber and steel. The ability to successfully develop rubber mill liners depends on three factors:l. Design2. Material (rubber compounding)3. Experience (knowledge)DESIGNThe main difference between steel and rubber, in material aspect, is the elasticity and the low tensile and shearing strength of rubber. It is necessary to take maximum advantage of the elasticity and to reduce tensile and shearing forces by minimizing the sliding of the mill charge. This is accomplished by using the Lorrain type of liners, i.e., lifter bars and plates. It is, however, necessary to keep a certain balance between lifter bars to optimize liner life and grinding performance."
Citation

APA: K. G. Eriksson  (1983)  Abrasion and Wear in Mills (c81aa51e-7cf2-4e98-8abb-ce5490402a45)

MLA: K. G. Eriksson Abrasion and Wear in Mills (c81aa51e-7cf2-4e98-8abb-ce5490402a45). Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 1983.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account