A Method for Distinguishing Sulphides from Oxides in the Metallography of Steel

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
George Comstock
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
8
File Size:
2024 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 12, 1916

Abstract

IT seems a common opinion among metallographists that all light-gray inclusions seen with the microscope in polished sections of steel are manganese sulphide. Examples of this belief are continually appearing, as for instance in the paper by Dr. Henry Fay on manganese sulphide as a source of danger in steel rails,1 and in Lieutenant-Commander Cook's paper on Metallography of Steel for U S. Naval Ordnance.2 Slate FIG. 1-TRANSVERSE VIEW OF THE EDGE OF A SMALL HOT-ROLLED STEEL ROD. ETCHED WITH PICRIC ACID. X 200. colored inclusions are considered to be silicates, and dove-gray inclusions, manganese sulphide. To show the danger in the latter unqualified assumption, it should be sufficient to examine the edge of any piece of steel that is covered with a fairly thick scale, and that has been polished in such a way as to prevent the scale from breaking away entirely below the polished surface. This can be done by protecting the scaled edge of
Citation

APA: George Comstock  (1916)  A Method for Distinguishing Sulphides from Oxides in the Metallography of Steel

MLA: George Comstock A Method for Distinguishing Sulphides from Oxides in the Metallography of Steel. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1916.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account