A Comparison Of The Use Of Various Fuels In Copper-Refining Furnaces

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 18
- File Size:
- 656 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1932
Abstract
THE reverberatory copper-refining furnaces at the Great Falls Reduction Dept. of the Anaconda Copper Mining Co. have used successively, as fuel, lump coal on grates, pulverized coal, oil and natural gas. In no other plant, so far as can be ascertained, has such a variety of fuels been used. This fact affords a unique opportunity for comparing the relative efficiency obtained with these several fuels under nearly identical conditions. FURNACES The present furnace refinery at Great Falls was placed in operation in April, 1916. The original installation consisted of two furnaces, each with hearths 36 by 14 ft. and provided with fire boxes 10 by 12 ft. for firing lump coal on grates. These furnaces had air-cooled sand bottoms and chrome-brick side walls both above and below the metal line. The roofs were of 12-in. silica brick. Each furnace was provided with a waste-heat boiler of approximately 400 boiler-hp. capacity. We soon found that chrome brick was very unsatisfactory as sidewall material because of its excessive spalling. At the first opportunity the furnaces were rebuilt, using magnesite brick below the metal line and silica brick from the metal line to the roof. At the same time the thickness of the side walls was increased, thus decreasing the width of the hearth to 13 ft. At about this time also, the thickness of the furnace roofs was increased from 12 to 15 in. No further changes occurred in furnace design until 1922, when the use of lump coal on grates was abandoned in favor of pulverized coal.
Citation
APA:
(1932) A Comparison Of The Use Of Various Fuels In Copper-Refining FurnacesMLA: A Comparison Of The Use Of Various Fuels In Copper-Refining Furnaces. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1932.