A Comparison of Grouting Techniques over 30 Years in 1969 and in 1999 for Southern Nevada Water Authority’s Lake Mead Intakes

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Jerry Ostberg Stephen J. Navin Jon Y. Kaneshiro
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
12
File Size:
3700 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2001

Abstract

In 1968, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation awarded S.S. Mullen Construction of Seattle, the Intake Tunnel (488 m by 4 m diameter tunnel) and Pumping Plant No. 1. In1998, the Southern Nevada Water Authority awarded Lake Mead Constructors (Kiewit of Omaha) a parallel New Intake Tunnel (518 m long by 4.6 m diameter tunnel) and Pumping Plant. Both projects provide water to a thirsty Las Vegas. This paper presents a detailed comparison of the two intake tunnels in terms of grout takes and pressures, geologic mapping and rock quality, grout penetration beyond the excavation line, degree of fracture grouting, and groundwater inflow boundary considerations. The paper provides a comparison of grouting techniques and material developments then and now.
Citation

APA: Jerry Ostberg Stephen J. Navin Jon Y. Kaneshiro  (2001)  A Comparison of Grouting Techniques over 30 Years in 1969 and in 1999 for Southern Nevada Water Authority’s Lake Mead Intakes

MLA: Jerry Ostberg Stephen J. Navin Jon Y. Kaneshiro A Comparison of Grouting Techniques over 30 Years in 1969 and in 1999 for Southern Nevada Water Authority’s Lake Mead Intakes. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2001.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account