A Comparison of Certain Forms of Ports for Steel¬ Melting Furnaces

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 5
- File Size:
- 315 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1881
Abstract
THE object of this paper is to make a brief comparison of the out-lines of several forms of ports for steel-melting furnaces, in reference chiefly to the proper mixture of the gas and air, and to the direction in which the flame is thrown down into. the interior of the furnace. In the illustrations on the accompanying plate, Fig. 1 shows a form of port designed by M. Pernot, of St Chamond, France. This is used with the dome roof preferred by him for the revolving bottom that bears his name. From No. I has been derived No. 2. This is shown on the plans of Mr., A. L. Holley, and from them three large furnaces have been built and put into operation by the Springfield Iron Company. Fig. 3 shows an outline proposed by Messrs. Richmond & Potts for the Pernot furnace. In this the ports are brought in under an arched. roof of nearly the ordinary form., instead of over the top of the roof, as with the done of M Pernot, Fig. 4 shows a furnace as built by Krupp of Essen, Prussia, for fluid refining, or “washing” -to use the briefer French term. In this the gas and air come into contact in broad sheets one above the. other. Fig. 5 shows the form used by Messrs, Richmond & Potts
Citation
APA:
(1881) A Comparison of Certain Forms of Ports for Steel¬ Melting FurnacesMLA: A Comparison of Certain Forms of Ports for Steel¬ Melting Furnaces. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1881.