If you have access to OneMine as part of a member benefit, log in through your member association website for a seamless user experience.
Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar Formula
×
Citation (Style = APA)
Scovazzo, Vincent A. (1995). Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar Formula. Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Ground Control in fining
Citation Downloads
Reference Manager (RIS)
SpreadSheed (CSV)
Scovazzo, Vincent A. (1995). Comparison Of Empirical, Analytical, And Numerical Methods Of Pillar Design And The Development Of A Site Specific Pillar Formula. Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Ground Control in fining
Citation Downloads
Reference Manager (RIS)
SpreadSheed (CSV)
Organization: International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
Pages: 8
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1995
Email to a Friend
Abstract
Abstract
| Many accepted and useful methods have been developed and used for pillar design. Each method has its own particular strengths and weaknesses. Three methods addressed in this paper are; empirical, analytical, and numerical. Each of these methods have their place in pillar design. Analytical methods result in close approximation of the ideal pillar (most economical, stable, or yielding) and are suitable for use in final mine design and in analyzing existing problems. BOYD uses the analytical method to develop site specific mine pillars design equations. An analytical method, one of many developed by BOYD, is presented here and is based on the procedure used by Wilson (1) and others in development of their empirical equations. |
Full Article Download:
