Current Trends In Roof Truss Hardware

Mangelsdorf, C. P.
Organization: International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
Pages: 5
Publication Date: Jan 1, 1982
The success of the Birmingham roof truss (Figure 1) in supporting some difficult roof conditions, particularly in the Illinois coal basin, has given impetus to the development of a number of alternate schemes. These schemes attempt to alleviate two major problems with the Birming-ham truss, namely, the time required for installation and the cost of material. Because of the difficulty of drilling angled holes and the number of different pieces of hardware which must be handled manually, most operators have been unable to install Birmingham trusses in the cycle and have had to schedule truss crews during the maintenance shift or whenever they would not impede production. Due to this delay the truss has traditionally been viewed as a supplemental form of roof support. In fact, the truss might qualify as primary support and replace at least two bolts if it could he installed in the cycle (and MSHA would accept it as an alternate in the roof plan.) [ ] Figure 1. The Birmingham truss. Two attempts to deal with the first difficulty have sought to streamline the truss hardware while preserving the essential character of the Birmingham truss. One of these, by Peabody Coal, is reported elsewhere in these proceedings by C. Bollier. Another is a contract issued by the Bureau of Mines to Bendix Corporation for the development of a machine, particularly suited for use in low coal, which will automate many of the operations currently executed manually. This machine is expected to be ready for field testing by fall of 1982. Once in place, a truss installed by either of these schemes will interact with the roof in the same way as a conventional Birmingham truss. An alternate approach has been proposed by several different manufacturers independently. Although the hardware details differ. the essential idea consists of two angle bolts, the heads of which are connected by a horizontal chord tightened to some pre-determined tension. Figure 2 shows the generalized concept and does not depict any one of the four systems proposed. The advantage of this scheme is that the angle bolts can be installed and tightened in the cycle, and as bolts, immediately satisfy the roof control plan. The horizontal chord can be added later to achieve almost any initial desired roof loading, the limits of which are defined below this scheme is referred to here as the angle-bolt truss. Because of a fundamental difference in the way in which load is transferred between chords, this design does not interact with the roof under subsequent loading in the same manner as a Birmingham truss. The purpose of this paper is to examine this fundamental difference and its consequences. [ ]
Full Article Download:
(1309 kb)

Additional chapters/articles from the SME-ICGCM book Proceedings Second Conference On Ground Control In Mining

A New Approach To The Design Of Multi-Entry Developments For
Manifestation Of Mine Pressure And Its Relations To Overlyin
Geotechnical Investigation For A Single Entry Design For Lon
Roof Falls And Caving In Longwall Mining Operations
Support Resistance And Roof Behaviour Of A Longwall Face Wit
State Of The Art Testing Of Powered Roof Supports
Some Structural Aspects Of Designing The Shield Supports
Design Considerations For Angle Bolters
Machine Design Parameters For High Seam Truss Bolting Applic
Design Trade-Off For Angle Roof Drilling
Hydraulic Tensioning Of A Birmingham Roof Truss
Current Trends In Roof Truss Hardware
The Search For A Method To Provide Warning Of Coal And Gas O
Methods Used To Monitor Roof Geology And Entry Supports
A Method For Estimating Western Coal Strengths From Point Lo
Coping With High Lateral Stresses In An Underground Illinois
Alternatives For Controlling Cutter Roof In Coal Mines
Remote Sensing Techniques In Mine Planning - Applications An
The Use Of A Graphic Mini-Computer System As A Rock Mechanic
Greater Safety With Increased Productivity Coal Mining Opera
Critical Roof Span Approach To Selection Of Proper Coal Mine
Roof Bolt Bond Tester; A Device For Nondestructive Testing O
Remote Control Roof Bolting
Development Cooperation Between Operator And Manufacturer -
Research, Development, And Use Of Steel-Fiber-Reinforced Con
TV Borehole Inspection And Vacuum Testing Of Roof Strata
Use Of Automated Resistivity System To Locate Potential Subs
Control Of Mine Subsidence Utilizing Coal Ash As A Backfill
Surface Flooding-Considerations For Mining Facilities Site S
The Formation And Effects Of Transient Abutment Stress Durin
Some Technical Considerations When Mining Under Bodies Of Wa